Latest news |
---|
Sony talks subscription-based services for PSNDVDBack23 @ Nov 20, 2009 18:44 | 17 comments
There is little to no chance that Sony will move the PSN to a subscription-based service like Microsoft does with Xbox Live Gold, and it is likely that Sony just hopes to expand their current pay-for features, such as movie rentals and the upcoming MMO "DC Universe Online."
JoyStiq spoke to a representative, who responded: "We have not made any formal announcements on a subscription based service. We're looking into a variety of options." Perhaps by throwing the words out there the company is testing to see public reaction to a possible pay-for PSN.
Writer's Note: We love our PSN Sony, but we certainly do not want to pay for it after having it for free for years. |
![]() |
Comment by: emugamer (Nov 20, 2009 19:09) Here's my reaction:
|
Comment by: warriorp (Nov 20, 2009 20:12) true that rightt there. i have a 360 but never paid for online it just sits collecting dust. thats why i bought a ps3 to play for free. im not paying 60 for a game the another fifty or sixty just to play online. thats crazy! i dont see how everyone does it with the xbox live. |
Comment by: rosedog (Nov 20, 2009 20:15) Agreed, I gave my 360 up because of my PS3 and its free service. I hope Sony chooses not to do this. |
Comment by: xnonsuchx (Nov 20, 2009 20:15) Hello??? It's only considering a subscription for PREMIUM services, not for existing PSN services.
|
Comment by: emugamer (Nov 20, 2009 20:23) Originally posted by xnonsuchx: It's a slight possibility - Quote: "little to no chance" and "likely" are the same as saying "possibly and "very likely" when it comes to announcements from these companies. Just putting my thoughts in there. If the idea of making online play a subscrition ever came to the table, or making the online experience anything like XBL, it should be taken off immediately. I don't care about the other premium services, all of which I don't use anyway.
|
Comment by: SDF_GR (Nov 20, 2009 20:39) Originally posted by emugamer: rolf, you are so right.
|
Comment by: TBandit (Nov 20, 2009 21:50) I 'd be willing to pay up to 10$ and maybe 20$ a year for their subscription fee if they entailed one. As long as the servers showed improvement and they cut out the cheaters online. I really hate it when I'm playing and a glitcher ruins the game doing some stupid |
Comment by: ZippyDSM (Nov 20, 2009 23:31) Its really simple really provide slightly better speed/ping to those who pay also offer them about 3 times as much free stuff in credits,ect. So say if I pay 9$ a month I get almost 30$ a month(non accumulating, spend them or be reset, they get spent first before the credits you buy with money) is PSN credits I can spend on anything in the PSN store. Now that would be something worthwhile but this nonsense of offering alil bit of free stuff for a monthly is stupid.... |
Comment by: DXR88 (Nov 20, 2009 23:54) My biggest gripe with PSN is it just doesn't have the cutting edge Servers that live does. hell im sure some of the servers they use are a good 9 to 10 years old and im sure some of the PSN servers are just old SOE servers. |
Comment by: ZippyDSM (Nov 20, 2009 23:57) Originally posted by DXR88: All the more reason to add a subscrip level but not change the free level any, give more free stuff to the subscribers and build thier bloody infrestuture up some. I hate how free live cripples the basics of online.... |
Comment by: Invasian (Nov 21, 2009 02:15) I have both systems, but since Modern Warfare 2 came out I got it for my PS3 instead because my subscription for XBL ran out. I don't mind PSN the gaming experience is the same. |
Comment by: bteamfox (Nov 21, 2009 05:46) I never do any thing that is subscription based. I buy a lot of games from the PSN store and would just not use the store any more if a subscription was in place like MS have. I wouldn't pay to play either. Heck the games cost enough already without having to pay to play them on-line. I bought two PS3's instead of two xbox 360's and a key factor was no subscription to PSN. SONY don't do it! |
Comment by: Unlockneo (Nov 21, 2009 14:33) Quote:
|
Comment by: canuckerz (Nov 21, 2009 15:28) It looks like a lot of people missed the purpose of the article and jumped to conclusions based mostly off the title of the story. |
Comment by: Amak (Nov 21, 2009 15:40) I read "Don't! I moved from the 360 because M$ rips you off! $50 a year! Don't do it Sony!"
|
Comment by: ZippyDSM (Nov 21, 2009 19:03) Originally posted by Amak: Ya I don;t have a problem ,in theory, with subscription based services, its just every time I see it in action I wonder why bother. |
Comment by: xboxd00d (Nov 27, 2009 18:12) I have always done ok on the free psn servers, most of my problems come with a very sub standard isp (Karoo for all us poor souls who live in Hull, we have no choice) :-(
|
