Latest news |
---|
Xbox 360 name change, redesign coming?DVDBack23 @ Sep 19, 2008 19:08 | 17 comments
Citing the same source that leaked evidence of the Xbox 360 Elite model in advance, a new leaked memo shows that the Xbox 360 revision could be called The Pure. The memo also shows that the revision so far has codenames "Lean" and "Granite" most likely alluding to a thinner case design and a new colorway.
The memo doesn't show any timetable would would make sense that the name change will come with the upcoming Valhalla chip design. The new chip will move the CPU and GPU into a single chip and will have less power consumption as well as well as make the system cooler. Although there is no official timeframe for the release of the Valhalla revision, many believe Q1 2009 is the time when manufacturing will begin.
Update: It has been brought to my attention by Jab1981 that this rumor was nothing more than a hoax contest by CheapAssGamer and therefore is absolutely not true. |
![]() |
Comment by: tavek (Sep 19, 2008 19:22) I think this is more in line for the NEW xbox 720 in allegedly 2012.
|
Comment by: tatsh (Sep 19, 2008 19:56) One of their reasons most probably for such a drastic revision is indeed to prevent playing backups and homebrew. Now they will do even more with the firmware of the drive and any other currently working modifications.
|
Comment by: mike.m (Sep 19, 2008 21:24) This is what happens when you don't plan ahead and come out way too early with a new console. I sold my pro last year to buy the elite, am I and millions of other 360 owners now going to have to buy everything all over again? If they do then they better offer some sort of trade-in program if there is a new disc format for the games, because there will be A LOT of unhappy customers if they do. |
Comment by: borhan9 (Sep 19, 2008 22:26) Have we thought that this maybe leaked by Microsoft themselves soo the roumor mill can start spinning. I think the main thing that Microsoft needs to make sure of is that the new console does not over heat. |
Comment by: DXR88 (Sep 19, 2008 23:56) Originally posted by borhan9:
|
Comment by: SProdigy (Sep 20, 2008 01:01) Way to go MS. Let's confuse the consumer some more! It's not enough to have all of these SKU's, but now let's change the names of our products. For their sake, I hope this is rumor and will be applied to future non-360 consoles, as this would just put the nail in the coffin on them looking like a confused business.
|
Comment by: ZippyDSM (Sep 20, 2008 01:05) Its about time and I support this is they get the hardware fixed and boost the over all performance by 50% so it can compete for the next 5 years, also I would not question it if they remove the HDD lock, if the HDD lock is in meh, if no real upgrade takes place whats the point? |
Comment by: SProdigy (Sep 20, 2008 01:05) Quote: That, and the fact there's no power supply in the case! |
Comment by: DXR88 (Sep 20, 2008 01:35) Quote:Quote: Bingo, same 360 less fat |
Comment by: lxhotboy (Sep 20, 2008 02:40) I hope they unlock the HDD myself and it would be nice to see console as small as the slim PS2 and the Wii. PS3 and xbox360 are almost big as a cpu tower. |
Comment by: Xplorer4 (Sep 20, 2008 03:43) Originally posted by tavek:
|
Comment by: jab1981 (Sep 20, 2008 11:32) It's some sort of CAGcast (cheap ass gamer) hoax contest.
|
Comment by: biglew15 (Sep 20, 2008 12:41) Originally posted by jab1981: The signature on the proposed document doesn't even match, looks like a complete forgery |
Comment by: atomicxl (Sep 20, 2008 12:47) Originally posted by mike.m: Only a fool would go about and buy a brand new version of something they already have thats still working. Thats like people who act like their DS is broken and needs to be replaced just because there is a slimmer version that adds no new features and their old one still will play every DS.
|
Comment by: DVDBack23 (Sep 20, 2008 16:43) Originally posted by jab1981: thank you for pointing that out, I will update the article. |
Comment by: mspurloc (Sep 20, 2008 17:36) Thank God it was a hoax.
|
Comment by: raceman94 (Sep 21, 2008 14:01) Sounds interesting anyway. |
