Latest news |
---|
Sony preparing 'break apart' Wii-like controller?DVDBack23 @ Jun 14, 2008 22:22 | 22 comments
Although not officially announced by Sony, the controller has been sent off to a few developer partners already meaning an E3 launch is possible.
If true, the controller could help bring the casual or family gamer over to the PlayStation 3. The Nintendo Wii currently dominates the casual gaming audience.
The original PS3 controller, the Sixaxis did include some motion sensing ability but nowhere near the freedom of movement a Wii-Mote allows. |
![]() |
Comment by: embo22000 (Jun 14, 2008 22:28) nice.....wii like games with ps3 graphics = perfection |
Comment by: SDF_GR (Jun 15, 2008 01:20) If sony continuous to move like that, very soon both nintedo and MS will have to release a new console to keep up.
|
Comment by: SProdigy (Jun 15, 2008 01:52) To allow the freedom that the Wiimote has, I think Sony is staring down at a possible lawsuit. I don't see how it would be possible to add more to the sixaxis motion without possibly violating a patent somewhere along the line.
|
Comment by: Vr0cK (Jun 15, 2008 05:40) I believe that Sony is only thinking of this as a back up to compete with Xbox360 because didnt Xbox360 started coming up with a controller like this as well? As all competetive companys should do, just trying to be prepared in case thats all. I think the sixaxis has great potential still so before Sony starts producing this new controller try optimizing the sixaxis first plz. I loved it in such games like Heavenly Sword where you can move and aim the arrow etc. When i hear "break-apart" controller im imagining the DS3 snap in half and each hand with an anolog stick. |
Comment by: DSWarrior (Jun 15, 2008 11:24) I believe there'll be a patent violation somewhere. Why don't Sony think of something original for a change? X360 is already doomed to becoming a very nice doorstop in most houses. PS3 is cool the way it is...why do they need to copy Nintendo?...I own a Wii and I love it, but Sony has no need to copy or try to copy anything...they should put their minds to work and actually invent something... |
Comment by: chaos_zzz (Jun 15, 2008 14:15) Originally posted by embo22000:
|
Comment by: SProdigy (Jun 15, 2008 14:22) I know I came to Nintendo's defense in the last post, but why does everyone feel that the 360 is becoming useless? They still have more consoles out the door than PS3 for one, and it's not like there's a huge difference in graphics or the gaming library at this time.
|
Comment by: Oner (Jun 15, 2008 15:18) Sony has had controller devices like this in development since the early PS2 days, mainly with their Eye Toy which had you interacting with items on screen with your arms/hands etc. I don't see how Nintendo would win a law suit when it comes to "copyrights" since they themselves blatantly ripped off the company Xavix who has quite a few titles that pre date Nintendo's offerings
![]() Search > http://forums.afterdawn.com/search Rules > http://forums.afterdawn.com/thread_view.cfm/2487 Important Rule > http://forums.afterdawn.com/thread_view.cfm/380660 |
Comment by: ZippyDSM (Jun 15, 2008 16:01) Sounds good as long as they pay the IP/CP on the design this time (nin dose not hold the rights to the motion setup FYI).
|
Comment by: Mr_Pink (Jun 15, 2008 16:38) What I don't understand is why people get bent out of shape when these consoles start developing something similar (or even an exact replica) to its competitor. Haven't we seen similar products since the beginning of business? From Pepsi and Coke, to car manufacturers, and computers, two rival companies with similar products is not new.
|
Comment by: ZippyDSM (Jun 15, 2008 16:46) Mr_Pink
|
Comment by: SDF_GR (Jun 15, 2008 18:42) Originally posted by SProdigy: I think they must have think of that for sure. They know what they are doing.
Originally posted by SProdigy: I think it would be something like a Pistol, that you use it only for specific games, not an all around controller, and in that case nintedo wont be able to do nothing. |
Comment by: o0cynix0o (Jun 16, 2008 04:31) Originally posted by SDF_GR: But with all the "casual gaming" good stuff comes the bad. Most of the "casual games" for the Wii aren't the best by anyones standards. And if you like the PS3 then that should be the last thing you would want. It's the only downfall I can really see for the Wii. The amount of crap out weighs the amount of good. stupid are you this read you if
|
Comment by: o0cynix0o (Jun 16, 2008 04:36) Quote:Originally posted by embo22000: Not true. Good looking crap is still crap. Don't get me wrong I own and like my Wii, but like I said above most of the casual crap for the Wii is still crap. |
Comment by: ZippyDSM (Jun 16, 2008 04:52) Quote:Originally posted by SDF_GR: Hate to tell you but normal gaming the cht they poo out for "normal" gamers? thats casual gaming too the qaulity in game dev has took a dev int he last 8 years the mass market focus has deicmented it the up side for the PS3 is that everyone would make sht for it and you can try and find the gems in the poo on one system.... doing on 3 makes you living in the world of 2 girls one cup.... |
Comment by: Vr0cK (Jun 16, 2008 12:16) To anybody that thinks Sony would be copying Nintendo i thought that Nintendo had copied Sony from the Onimusha 3 game with the sword controller.
|
Comment by: SProdigy (Jun 16, 2008 14:37) Agreed: good looking crap is still crap (Soldier of Fortune.)
|
Comment by: Oner (Jun 16, 2008 16:15) Wow you pulled out Steel Battalion! Nice lol! ![]() Search > http://forums.afterdawn.com/search Rules > http://forums.afterdawn.com/thread_view.cfm/2487 Important Rule > http://forums.afterdawn.com/thread_view.cfm/380660 |
Comment by: lynchGOP (Jun 16, 2008 17:24) Originally posted by embo22000:
|
Comment by: embo22000 (Jun 16, 2008 23:57) Quote:Originally posted by embo22000:
|
Comment by: Anonymous User (Sep 22, 2010 03:22) type your comments here
|
Comment by: Anonymous User (Sep 22, 2010 03:31) type your comments here
|
