Latest news |
---|
GameStop accuses Nintendo of limiting Wii stockDVDBack23 @ Mar 29, 2007 01:04 | 21 comments
DeMatteo has stated that he believes that Nintendo hit its wanted target for the 2006 fiscal year and is withholding stock to boost performance in the first quarter of 2007.
"This is just my opinion – I think they intentionally dried up supply because they made their numbers for the year. Their new year starts April 1 and I think we're going to see supply flowing," he said. He expalined that they were getting shipments for April, and hopes to not have crippling shortages in the future.
"Next week we get our first allocations of Wii and DS and we are quite pleased with those numbers. We are concerned about the dryness here in March, but it looks like April is going to be good," commented DeMatteo.
Source: |
![]() |
Comment by: azndrake (Mar 29, 2007 02:06) Thats very interesting, i knew it had something to do with marketing. |
Comment by: munx (Mar 29, 2007 02:06) The beauty of economics. I would not be surprised at all if this was nintendo's strategy. It just makes sense, limit supply and you will inevitably drive demand and profit will follow with that. Futures Market... |
Comment by: ZippyDSM (Mar 29, 2007 02:08) Perhaps the WII is a phemonenom witch and simply you cant see because your to busy burning used PC games instead of selling them like any sane retailer should....god forbid a old game should take up shelf space and sale more than crappy new titles. |
Comment by: kyo28 (Mar 29, 2007 02:22) Originally posted by munx:
|
Comment by: OzMick (Mar 29, 2007 02:30) Maybe they are just selling a %$#& ton of consoles and supply doesn't yet meet demand? It doesn't make much business sense to be able to manufacture at a rate that exceeds initial demand, you are permanently scaling back production from day 1 that way. This seems to be the mentality that Sony has adopted with the PS3, demand will thus never reach supply, and any economist will tell you stock on shelves COSTS money. One could also say that Sony is basing their distribution on a push-distribution strategy, Nintendo is working on more of a pull-distribution strategy. Check out http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Push-Pull_strategy Nintendo's problem is that they didn't stockpile sufficiently before release, so initial demand wasn't met.
|
Comment by: oofRome (Mar 29, 2007 02:45) Response from george harrison:
|
Comment by: ZippyDSM (Mar 29, 2007 03:02) Its been argued that keeping a console in a hard to find manner after launch keeps the interest of it up and makes it sale more than heavily stocking(within reason) retailers and having ti easily gotten but the interest of it wanes,it also looks better on the books if you only put out X amount of stock and sale most if not all of it out then you can start the next wave in a slightly "better" manner.
|
Comment by: kyo28 (Mar 29, 2007 04:14) Originally posted by OzMick:
|
Comment by: dazila (Mar 29, 2007 06:44) As people said its because of the shares im on that aswell it would work out perfectly for them Wii is flying in sales and is catching the 360 and will have caught it in i'd say the next 2 months but iam dissapointed that no good games are comming any time soon.
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Comment by: BobbyBlu (Mar 29, 2007 07:29) I wonder how much of them trying to fight pircy with that new modchip being out have to do with this?Because i think they are don't something to there system to make it hard to add the Wii Chip.Nintendo has been pretty much a St8 forward company in there past. |
Comment by: SProdigy (Mar 29, 2007 08:46) It has to do with the Fiscal calendar, as pointed out. The Japanese fiscal calendar means zip when they are Nintendo of America, and are an American Corporation. Here in the USA, you can set your fiscal calendar to end whenever you want to. I'm sure it's easier for them to end it in April if that is what happens in Japan. They met their goal, and don't have to rush to put anything out for a week or so. Smart move for their investors. It's a numbers game.
|
Comment by: oofRome (Mar 29, 2007 13:12) Quote: Which, as I said earlier, seems unlikely considering Nintendo is looking for another manufacturing partner as we speak.
|
Comment by: handsom (Mar 29, 2007 13:22) It's ironic, Nintendo has had several large shipments as of late, and the demand is high for their system. Considering the demand for these things, they've set an unprecendented record for keeping stock as much as possible with this system. Sony has been pegged for this several times to a ridiculous point, and until information came out about problems with M$' factories people had thought they did with 360; turned out it was just horrible timing for manufacturing plants to go down, some for regular maintenence, others for emergency conditions(Think fire and boom).
|
Comment by: tsumiro (Mar 29, 2007 15:02) kinda screwed up, but... they have to make a living too, ya know? |
Comment by: pollution (Mar 29, 2007 17:12) I am glad they are limiting stock. I realized that I do not want a Wii after waiting. Nintendo lost a sale! |
Comment by: fgamer (Mar 30, 2007 04:32) Originally posted by pollution: I kinda agree too the more I've waited for a Wii I've completely lost interest in it, especially after some of the games like Red Steal not being that fun. |
Comment by: ZippyDSM (Mar 30, 2007 07:10) handsom
|
Comment by: handsom (Mar 30, 2007 08:55) As a victim of these hardware issues, I whole-heartedly agree. I'm just angry that the manufacturers (Outsourced by M$) did such a crap job making the physical units, bad solder, etc; these aren't design flaws, they're manufacturing flaws. On one hand, M$ paid for quality, and even paid a little extra for some of the manufacturers; on the other hand, I still wish M$ had done a complete recall on 'Day One' systems, I wouldn't be sitting here with a towel around my system, wondering how long before it's a total brick.
|
Comment by: ZippyDSM (Mar 30, 2007 09:01) handsom
|
Comment by: mcsol (Apr 01, 2007 11:22) Remember, the console is sold at a loss - money comes in through games. Nintendo would not at all benefit from a self-limited stock. Tha Gamestop guy is probably just pissed that the big stores like target or walmart got higher allocations...
|
Comment by: handsom (Apr 01, 2007 13:06) @mcsol
|
