News

Comment by: azndrake (Mar 24, 2007 18:32)

Great news now ps3 is currently at
OS Type Current TFLOPS*
PLAYSTATION®3 639
http://fah-web.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/main.py?qtype=osstats

Comment by: BobbyBlu (Mar 24, 2007 21:38)

Quote:

---

the problem of having to pre install games i thought was what a game machine was about so you haven't got to do this? with a 60(54.5) gig hard drive you are soon going to run out of room! i think i'll be paying close attention to the no 2nd hand game resale as i bet sony do a complete u turn over this one! apparently even installing a game to the hd will not lock it to one machine but if a Blu-ray can be traced by its serial and shut-down i reckon there will be a way to track a game just as easily. already inbuilt in the ps3 like aacs flags just waiting to be activated!

---

Not even a issue you answer your own question far as the size of the data on the HD isn't a issue.Not all game does this i got 10 games on my HD i can tell you that that data total is not over 2gigs.I'm a day one owner & i have yet to get down to 40gigs i got music,movies, & photos on my HD also.But the good thing is at least Sony give you a option to install a bigger HD other companys don't.

Comment by: ZippyDSM (Mar 24, 2007 21:55)

HD caching will help games load and wont always need allot of space,since it will most likely limit what it needs out side of playing(1GB not playing 5GB playing) plus BR is not that slow any speed issues would be "fixed" via HD caching.

BB
Newer larger games will most likely fully utilize HD caching so they will be using more space but even the 20GB should have enough for gaming and lite media.

Comment by: SProdigy (Mar 24, 2007 21:59)

Right on Zippy,

How many of those idle clock cycles are coming from someone's old Athlon K6 they had lying around and said "hey, we can help donate to this noble cause." However, all PS3 systems have identical hardware and a 9 core Cell processor. It's a very unfair comparison. I'm not a PS3 fan, but I'm glad they've included this for those who wish to help.

Comment by: ZippyDSM (Mar 24, 2007 22:20)

Originally posted by SProdigy:

---

Right on Zippy,

How many of those idle clock cycles are coming from someone's old Athlon K6 they had lying around and said "hey, we can help donate to this noble cause." However, all PS3 systems have identical hardware and a 9 core Cell processor. It's a very unfair comparison. I'm not a PS3 fan, but I'm glad they've included this for those who wish to help.

---

I don't mean to rain on the worshiping of the PS3 just trying to state some fact,even tho I have my own basis,another thing about the PS3 is its not "9 core" its 1 solid core with extra mini 2ndry processing units that can take presser off the main core as well as route data more efficantly,software has to catch up to it,the PS3 should shine around 09 for now tho its simply just another BR player.
I also have a feeling the 360 model with with Hdvd and refined high def chip set will be rearing its head in the 09-011 time frame,MS could simply release a Xbox 2 then but without full BWC to the xbox and 360 I wouldn't want it.

Comment by: azndrake (Mar 25, 2007 00:15)

I am 100% sure that the XBOX 360 will unable to even close to the ps3's rate on folding. I am a ps3 owner and that program almost uses 100% of the ps3's CPU. With the program on I was finally able to hear the ps3's fans revving up. Also I am sure if the Xbox tries to do the same it will overheat for sure. Since the noise level for the 360 is already noticeable I doubt it can handle the tremendous task of doing folding in speeds near the ps3. Folding was going to be on the XBOX and the Ps3, but they dropped the Xbox idea knowing it was not capable of running at speeds near the ps3.

If the Xbox 360 were to have folding it would make Microsoft's Xbox look inferior to the ps3, so Microsoft dropped the idea. Microsoft like other companies will always try to find new ways to make their product more attractive than their competitors, that’s the rules of business. So the only reason they don’t have folding is because they know damn well ps3 will make Xbox look like crap.

Lets recap the two reasons I have came up are Xbox will overheat when using folding and Microsoft knows the PS3 will outscore Xbox by a lot. There are probably a lot more reasons on why Xbox does not have folding but for now these are all I can think have right now. Remember this all has to do with marketing that’s the ultimate reason the PS3 has folding to show off it its CPU power.


side note: how many posts do i need to become a member?

Comment by: azndrake (Mar 25, 2007 00:28)

Also the PS3 is now at 666 TFLOPS with 27180 active PS3s compared to window's 152 TFLOPS with 160218 active cpus.

http://fah-web.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/main.py?qtype=osstats

Comment by: Dela (Mar 25, 2007 05:38)

702 Teraflops from PS3 now, Folding@Home is approaching Petaflops :D i think the world's fastest super computer tops out there. Now, as somebody mentioned, obviously the windows machines are of all different CPUs, and not only that but since Folding@Home uses idle CPU cycles, a lot of those machines are already in use Folding@Home works away, buyt that being said, Nobody is trying to compare the PS3 with Windows or MAC or anything like that... whny is it that even with thios ppl get offendeD? I just don't get it, this is a fantastic and really I couldn't care less what powers it as long as its running strong and Kudos to Sony for supporting the project and giving it another powerful platform to run on.

Comment by: BobbyBlu (Mar 25, 2007 08:09)

Quote:

---

Nobody is trying to compare the PS3 with Windows or MAC or anything like that... why is it that even with thios ppl get offendeD? I just don't get it, this is a fantastic and really I couldn't care less what powers it as long as its running strong and Kudos to Sony for supporting the project and giving it another powerful platform to run on.

---

Thats easy to answer DELA some people have hate toward some company's that they always going to say or find something negative about them & refuse to give a company credit when credit due, period.

Comment by: spydah (Mar 25, 2007 08:13)

I agree with the last few posters. I got both 360 and PS3 so far my PS3 is out shining the 360. I'm currently on 360 number 3 and still on PS3 number for now. I really dont think my 360 will hold up doing what the PS3 does in TFLOPS.

Comment by: Dela (Mar 25, 2007 09:45)

You all will find it interesting to know that there seems to be some calls across the net for M$ to incorporate Folding@Home to Xbox 360/Live. I did a lot of reading around as I might write an article about it. Lot of people are obviously concerned about the heat the 360 produces already (which i can definitely say my 360 runs hot) but some others are saying that a modified Folding@Home thats powered by the 360's Xenos GPU could match or exceed Cell output for F@H.

Now I think these suggestions sources from people who don't care about fanboyism., they just see potential in bringing folding@home to 10 million+ Xbox 360's now. Of course, some will make it a fanboy war, but I guess if both consoles did support it, it would in the end benefit folding@home and a good cause, so I don;t know, but I would be skeptical of folding running for hours at a time on my own 360, thats not a shot at all 360 units but mine definitely does get warm ;-)

Comment by: ZippyDSM (Mar 25, 2007 10:03)

Dela
people tend to forget I was all for the PS3 till it became a reality and Sony kept shoving things under the carpet,the issues with both consoles aside I am more interested in "full potential" rigged number schemes give me a headache,I have no doubt the PS3 can achive acouple hundred more than current mid range and higher consumer PC's I have no doubt the 360 would be acouple hundred behind PS3 but in all focusing on the numbers for this is silly and shows your like of fully understanding the whole picture.

Folding@Home is a great project tarnished only by Sonys mad PR campaign,its a shame ninvida and MS have told them to take a hike but its as much of one to have them prance around and push it in everyones face when they are the only real high end manufacturer to go out of their way to support it.

Comment by: Zoolook2 (Mar 25, 2007 10:23)

You are all a bit misled by the FLOP numbers, one FLOP is not the same on the different platforms, one floating point operation can do a lot more work on say a C2D than on a PS3 which in turn can make more work with one flop than an ATI GPU, the only way to compare the different platforms are to compare the time/frame on a similar wu.

Comment by: ChiknLitl (Mar 25, 2007 10:33)

I must say that Dela has picked a nice topic to spur quite a bit of discussion [Insert pat on the back]. Good job! It would be interesting to see the comparison of PS3 vs 360, nerve wracking for both sides, but interesting. It certainly would provide plenty of fodder for this next gen battle. Despite the good cause, are people concerned about the lifespan of their console? Running the console at full capacity for extended periods would conceivably cause wear. Could there be warranty issues if problems arise? And hey, what the heck, why don't we get on the horn to the big N and get the Wii involved?!

Comment by: ZippyDSM (Mar 25, 2007 11:15)

Originally posted by ChiknLitl:

---

I must say that Dela has picked a nice topic to spur quite a bit of discussion [Insert pat on the back]. Good job! It would be interesting to see the comparison of PS3 vs 360, nerve wracking for both sides, but interesting. It certainly would provide plenty of fodder for this next gen battle. Despite the good cause, are people concerned about the lifespan of their console? Running the console at full capacity for extended periods would conceivably cause wear. Could there be warranty issues if problems arise? And hey, what the heck, why don't we get on the horn to the big N and get the Wii involved?!

---

I thought the point was running it in the background not always at full power,or has that option not been implemented for the PS3?

As for life span....lets face it the hardware issues for the 360 are "unqie" I dont think any other console has had so many issues with its CPU and heat sinks killing the motherboard/cpu ,heat dispensation becomes a huge problem when you miniaturize stuff the 360 begin a custom PC in most regards,the PS3 was built ground up with a bit more forethought put into the hardware witch they are wrapeing to make it cheaper tis the sony way I just hope the lens unit is more solid than some of sonys DVD lens units of the past.

Comment by: BobbyBlu (Mar 25, 2007 12:03)

Quote:

---

Folding@Home is a great project tarnished only by Sonys mad PR campaign,its a shame ninvida and MS have told them to take a hike but its as much of one to have them prance around and push it in everyones face when they are the only real high end manufacturer to go out of their way to support it.

---

My god why everything got to be a PR spin Sony at the point they don't need trash like PR spin....Open your eyes no matter which system its on it for a good cause....Damm.

I hope in the future Nintendo & Microsoft use this.This article is more about people trying to save other people lives not about fame and dollars.

Comment by: ZippyDSM (Mar 25, 2007 12:11)

BB
cant seem to read can you....

Quote:

---

Folding@Home is a great project tarnished only by Sonys mad PR campaign,its a shame ninvida and MS have told them to take a hike but its as much of one to have them prance around and push it in everyones face when they are the only real high end manufacturer to go out of their way to support it.

---

you don't have to be a fanboy for ever little thing.

Comment by: azndrake (Mar 26, 2007 00:46)

like i said earlier, Microsoft's XBox will not use folding, because it will make it look like their product is inferior to the ps3. Look up to my earlier post for full details :P.

Comment by: ZippyDSM (Mar 26, 2007 08:56)

Originally posted by azndrake:

---

like i said earlier, Microsoft's XBox will not use folding, because it will make it look like their product is inferior to the ps3. Look up to my earlier post for full details :P.

---

:P
someone should mod it for the 360 out of spite :P

Comment by: Pop_Smith (Mar 26, 2007 15:48)

An interesting fact about the PS3 F@H. Based on PS3 FAQ located here

In a nutshell, the PS3 takes the middle ground between GPU's (extreme speed, but at limited types of WU's) and CPU's (less speed, but more flexibility in types of WU's).

It also states that 'GPU' is actually faster then the PS3. They picked the PS3 as the "Middle Ground" between speed (The PS3 is slower then GPU but faster then CPU) and flexibility (more flexible than GPU, less than CPU).

Those are some interesting facts right there. They are all off of Stanford's PS3 FAQ which you read here.

Comment by: ZippyDSM (Mar 26, 2007 16:21)

Pop_Smith
sounds about right all of the crap I have read(and forgotten :P) abotu the PS3 and its archetype is its not all that powerful but tis good at what it dose and should be the best console at physics and perhaps at its best when the software catches up as good as mid/high range consumer gaming PCs.

Comment by: anubis66 (Mar 26, 2007 17:12)

so does the ps3 folding@home use both the cell and the rsx?

Comment by: Andrew691 (Mar 26, 2007 23:53)

Quote:

---

VISUALIZATION
How does the PS3 client's visualization compare to other FAH clients?
The PS3 client will also support some advanced visualization features. While the Cell microprocessor does most of the calculation processing of the simulation, the graphic chip of the PLAYSTATION 3 system (the RSX) displays the actual folding process in real-time using new technologies such as HDR and ISO surface rendering. It is possible to navigate the 3D space of the molecule using the interactive controller of the PS3, allowing us to look at the protein from different angles in real-time.

---

From the FAQ page POP_SMITH posted.

Comment by: anubis66 (Mar 27, 2007 11:22)

but what im saying is not does it use it for graphical reasons. i'm asking if it uses the rsx for calculations. id rather not see the molecule (since i dont watch it run very long) and let the rsx dedicate itself to more calculations. maybe 2 folding processes going simultaniously.

Comment by: ZippyDSM (Mar 27, 2007 11:26)

Originally posted by anubis66:

---

but what im saying is not does it use it for graphical reasons. i'm asking if it uses the rsx for calculations. id rather not see the molecule (since i dont watch it run very long) and let the rsx dedicate itself to more calculations. maybe 2 folding processes going simultaniously.

---

me thinks to much coffee and hashing together a 3d app to show what it was doing was eiser than getting the next version done *L*

but really why dose a background data calc program need a fancy 3D part?