News

Comment by: DXR88 (May 29, 2009 02:52)

well of coarse it is, why else you you throw a Sissy fit over leaked photo's. we really didn't need a follow up.

Comment by: SDF_GR (May 29, 2009 12:59)

It is too ugly imo.

Comment by: Oner (May 29, 2009 13:18)

And another article says it's fake ~ http://www.ultimateps3.fr/news-ps3-2493-...s-are-fake.html

Search > http://forums.afterdawn.com/search
Rules > http://forums.afterdawn.com/thread_view.cfm/2487
Important Rule > http://forums.afterdawn.com/thread_view.cfm/380660

Comment by: lecsiy (May 29, 2009 21:37)

Quote:

---

It is too ugly imo.

---

Agreed. For the money Sony are charging i'd expect it to look the absolute bollocks. Instead it looked (Assuming the "leaked" photos are real) tacky and pretty boring.

Therefore that over priced only good for bluray piece of, err, "hardware" isn't worth my hard earned cash just yet :)

Lecsiy

Comment by: kikzm33z (May 29, 2009 22:52)

There must be a catch to the Slim.

It can't be that slim and still have the same potential as the original PS3s.. Can it?

Comment by: DXR88 (May 29, 2009 23:10)

Originally posted by kikzm33z:

---

There must be a catch to the Slim.

It can't be that slim and still have the same potential as the original PS3s.. Can it?

---

No it cant, expect less features for less money. lets just hope it isn't a flop like the PS2 slimline

Comment by: core2kid (May 30, 2009 00:09)

Quote:

---

Originally posted by kikzm33z:

---

There must be a catch to the Slim.

It can't be that slim and still have the same potential as the original PS3s.. Can it?

---

No it cant, expect less features for less money. lets just hope it isn't a flop like the PS2 slimline

---

Why was the PS2 slimline a flop? I thought it was good. The use of FMCB rendered the need for HDloader useless.

Comment by: canuckerz (May 30, 2009 00:27)

Originally posted by kikzm33z:

---

There must be a catch to the Slim.

It can't be that slim and still have the same potential as the original PS3s.. Can it?

---

Technology quadruples every 2 years or something like that, having the same features of the original ps3 in a smaller form factor now is easily within grasp. In fact I'd go so far as to be curious about what they added.

Comment by: DXR88 (May 30, 2009 01:28)

the Slimline Was a flop, it was lacking from its big older brother it had less feature an was more cheaply built for only a 25 dollar difference.

the Older PS2 models starting at SCPH10001 ending in SCPH50001 where the best made well designed systems.

Ive owned 2 Slimline's both have been broken in less than a year. my launch console lasted 4 years till it was destroyed in a hurricane incident. I've since bought a used SCPH39001 and it is going strong for 3 years.

Slimmer is not better it leads to more issue's, they should just stick with current models and drop the price. if there reluctant to do that you think there going to add more features,yeah right we can always dream.

the PS3 slim is going to be a watered down version of its bigger brother.

Comment by: Morreale (May 30, 2009 03:40)

Slimmer can be better if it's designed properly...

Comment by: core2kid (May 30, 2009 03:49)

Originally posted by Morreale:

---

Slimmer can be better if it's designed properly...

---

I started noticing a decrease in laser efficiency on my SCPH-30001 about 1 1/2 year after I bought it. Basically it still read discs but it would take longer to load and would skip on scraches easily. It also stopped playing CD-RWs. It was then replaced for free by GameStop because their multitap blew the PS9 fuse inside my console preventing it from vibrating and reading multitaps and some memory cards. The replacement I choose was another SCHP-30001R over the slim and that has been going strong till today, warranty seal intact and it reads DVD-RWs (though I don't throw those at it), So basically around 8 years. My slimline has never had a problem either except the one time it refused to read discs. It wouldn't even acnowledge that there was a disc inside. I had to unplug it while it was on to drain the static charge out of it and let it sit for a couple mins. It then loaded fine. My Slimline is an SCPH-70012.

In my opinion, the only consoles that suffered problems were the earliest PS2 models with the A/B revision lasers. The C revision lasers were fine but still not perfect. The slimline lasers were perfect as long as no additional mods were done to the system. I have never had a heat problem in my slimline PS2, I have run it for about 4 hours straight.

Comment by: Morreale (May 30, 2009 03:56)

Quote:

---

Originally posted by Morreale:

---

Slimmer can be better if it's designed properly...

---

I started noticing a decrease in laser efficiency on my SCPH-30001 about 1 1/2 year after I bought it. Basically it still read discs but it would take longer to load and would skip on scraches easily. It also stopped playing CD-RWs. It was then replaced for free by GameStop because their multitap blew the PS9 fuse inside my console preventing it from vibrating and reading multitaps and some memory cards. The replacement I choose was another SCHP-30001R over the slim and that has been going strong till today, warranty seal intact and it reads DVD-RWs (though I don't throw those at it), So basically around 8 years. My slimline has never had a problem either except the one time it refused to read discs. It wouldn't even acnowledge that there was a disc inside. I had to unplug it while it was on to drain the static charge out of it and let it sit for a couple mins. It then loaded fine. My Slimline is an SCPH-70012.

In my opinion, the only consoles that suffered problems were the earliest PS2 models with the A/B revision lasers. The C revision lasers were fine but still not perfect. The slimline lasers were perfect as long as no additional mods were done to the system. I have never had a heat problem in my slimline PS2, I have run it for about 4 hours straight.

---

I had a slim that I played regularly for a year or so... Sometimes it would be left on for like 12 hours cause I would go somewhere and forget about the game I was playing. After being on for a while it would get pretty hot but never overheated or anything. I sold it though cause my friend sold me his FAT PS2 for $1 and Cogswap is simple and free. Slim needs sensors blocked...

Comment by: core2kid (May 30, 2009 04:00)

Quote:

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by Morreale:

---

Slimmer can be better if it's designed properly...

---

I started noticing a decrease in laser efficiency on my SCPH-30001 about 1 1/2 year after I bought it. Basically it still read discs but it would take longer to load and would skip on scraches easily. It also stopped playing CD-RWs. It was then replaced for free by GameStop because their multitap blew the PS9 fuse inside my console preventing it from vibrating and reading multitaps and some memory cards. The replacement I choose was another SCHP-30001R over the slim and that has been going strong till today, warranty seal intact and it reads DVD-RWs (though I don't throw those at it), So basically around 8 years. My slimline has never had a problem either except the one time it refused to read discs. It wouldn't even acnowledge that there was a disc inside. I had to unplug it while it was on to drain the static charge out of it and let it sit for a couple mins. It then loaded fine. My Slimline is an SCPH-70012.

In my opinion, the only consoles that suffered problems were the earliest PS2 models with the A/B revision lasers. The C revision lasers were fine but still not perfect. The slimline lasers were perfect as long as no additional mods were done to the system. I have never had a heat problem in my slimline PS2, I have run it for about 4 hours straight.

---

I had a slim that I played regularly for a year or so... Sometimes it would be left on for like 12 hours cause I would go somewhere and forget about the game I was playing. After being on for a while it would get pretty hot but never overheated or anything. I sold it though cause my friend sold me his FAT PS2 for $1 and Cogswap is simple and free. Slim needs sensors blocked...

---

I use FMCB. It's a whole lot easier than Cogswap and it works on any PS2 except the new 90000 models. Check it out if you haven't yet. It's amazing.

Comment by: pphoenix (May 30, 2009 09:33)

Why should it matter?

Who cares if it's real or fake?

This is free advertising through hype. Leak a story, x company deny it, leak a bit more info, x company deny it.

How many times have we seen this before?

All that should matter is does it cost less for end users, is there a change for the worse/better in functionality, like Sony's previous improvement of removing PS2 compatibility?

Comment by: core2kid (May 30, 2009 13:53)

Originally posted by pphoenix:

---

Why should it matter?

Who cares if it's real or fake?

This is free advertising through hype. Leak a story, x company deny it, leak a bit more info, x company deny it.

How many times have we seen this before?

All that should matter is does it cost less for end users, is there a change for the worse/better in functionality, like Sony's previous improvement of removing PS2 compatibility?

---

Removing B/C was no improvement in my opinion. If someone didn't have a PS2 or a broken PS2, the B/C for a library of games consisting of 500+ games is a huge selling point. I did not get a PS3 until I got my hands on the 80GB B/C model.

Comment by: Morreale (May 30, 2009 15:20)

Well, people wanted cheaper, BWC just had to go. Maybe in the future when more materials are cheaper it could be back, but for now be happy with the current price as it was $100 more with BWC.

Comment by: core2kid (May 30, 2009 15:25)

Originally posted by Morreale:

---

Well, people wanted cheaper, BWC just had to go. Maybe in the future when more materials are cheaper it could be back, but for now be happy with the current price as it was $100 more with BWC.

---

I agree but I'd prefer to have the media card readers back if I was to buy a PS3 again. I have used it countless times and the fact that its a multimedia system makes the media card readers important. The 2 extra USB ports are useless, 2 work fine. B/C should be free. With the power of the PS3, they could completly emulate B/C like the 360. Something is better than nothing.

Comment by: pphoenix (May 31, 2009 08:55)

Mr core2kid, that was sarcasm removing B/C was a humongous error.

Originally posted by Morreale:

---

Well, people wanted cheaper, BWC just had to go. Maybe in the future when more materials are cheaper it could be back, but for now be happy with the current price as it was $100 more with BWC.

---

Emulation would have cost very little but sony appeared at the time, beset on selling "working on the PS3", ps2 titles through the PSN, ever heard of double dipping?

This story being released and then denied is nothing more that fanning the flames to get free advertising & drum up business, it's all very transparent, & shows "x" company's deceitful nature to obtain capital through underhand tactics, by avoiding having to pay advertising fees.

Comment by: oneguy (Jun 17, 2009 17:00)

you think it'll come with a controller?

Comment by: brad1798 (Jun 19, 2009 12:35)

incase no one noticed i think that those supposed leaked photos are actually just the top part of a normal ps3 with a couple of photoshops...im not that smart but thats what it looks like to me

Comment by: Goshikku (Jun 21, 2009 18:16)

spam edited by ddp

Comment by: DXR88 (Jun 21, 2009 19:18)

Hey ad whats up with these spammers, man theyve increased in activity since a year ago.

Comment by: Morreale (Jun 21, 2009 20:17)

Originally posted by DXR88:

---

Hey ad whats up with these spammers, man theyve increased in activity since a year ago.

---

I know, wtf is goin' on lol