Latest news |
---|
'Medal of Honor' blocked from U.S. military basesDVDBack23 @ Sep 06, 2010 04:39 | 45 comments
The game was banned because in the game's multiplayer mode you can play as either the Americans (and allies) or as the Taliban insurgents, a fact that angered former vets and parents of vets.
"I don't see how shooting soldiers based on real Americans is entertainment while people are dying every day for this country," said Karen Meredith. Meredith's son, a former Army lieutenant, was killed during the Iraqi conflict in 2004.
"How can they say it's OK for someone to play the Taliban? You'll have people sitting at home, drinking beer, shooting at American soldiers, maybe missing, then starting over. Well, Ken didn't have a chance to start over," finished Meredith.
The decision in the U.S. is the second time an allied country has made a fuss over the title, with British Defense Secretary Liam Fox asking retailers to not stock the game. |
![]() |
Comment by: xboxdvl2 (Sep 08, 2010 06:30) its only a video game.I use to live with a war veteran and when i was playing medal of honor if i had the volumn too loud i'd see him hiding in the backyard and jumping around.ducking when he heard gunshots on the game.eventually i showed him it was only a game and not a real war and he was more relaxed.
PS2 with 12 games.
pc-windows 7,intel core quad Q8400,4 Gb ddr2,WD 500 GB hdd,ATI Radeon HD 4550 graphics,AOC 22inch LCD moniter. |
Comment by: 07anto07 (Sep 08, 2010 10:09) wtf this is mad
![]() |
Comment by: kikzm33z (Sep 08, 2010 15:46) It's a game.
|
Comment by: 07anto07 (Sep 09, 2010 11:02) so this will be released in Ireland then?
![]() |
Comment by: dippers (Sep 09, 2010 14:01) What does a teenage Afghan lad make of this discussion? He has maybe seen seen his father, brother or sister killed by American soldiers. But the game is a problem because it shows American soldiers being killed by Afghans!! Very Bad!! Afghans killed by Americans....Very Good!!! What a load of nonsense. Is the game banned in Kabul because it shows images of American soldiers killing Taliban?
|
Comment by: Zeveroth (Sep 09, 2010 15:12) First and Foremost, I served in the US Army for 2 years before being injured and discharged. Although the Iraq war had not started yet. I was part of the Kosovo Conflict. I joined in 1999. We were there to drive out the Yugoslavian forces and stop the bitter conflict. Unfortunately we did not quite complete the mission before departure but my point is that I would have and still do play war games. I can not get mad b/c people have a choice whether or not to play a American soldier or a Taliban soldier. I extend my deepest sympathy to MRS. Meredith for her loss, but to say that this game has anything to do with her son and any other "real life" soldier is just ridiculous. We as a nation are forgetting that there are boundaries between fiction and non fiction. this game pushes those boundaries, maybe, but it is a game for the love of god. We need not get too serious with it. I, on the other hand, do agree that selling this game ON a military installation could bring moral down b/c some soldiers may take offense to the option of being the enemy combatant in a current and ongoing fight. Yet others may agree that it is a very good training tool. If we play it over lan or the net, soldiers may in fact use it for training after hours. What better way to train than to have your buddy play the "ruthless enemy" and you play the "All American Soldier". A fire fight would ensue and with your buddy attacking you like the Taliban, you would have to make the right decisions to survive, just like in real life. I hope this clears up soon b/c I am disappointed with MRS. Meredith's comment on the "retry" issue.
Dare to dream of a dream. Then wake up in a dream. There we will find our true destiny.
|
Comment by: babelfish (Sep 09, 2010 15:20) Originally posted by wiseguy0: the SAS are the special boat service. the elite british troops. they were fighting in ww2 when the yanks were still hiding for all those years.
:: If you were a woman i'd sock you - Peter Griffin ::
|
Comment by: LM2008 (Sep 09, 2010 17:53) I know there's a lot of ignorant game fanatics who don't give a damn of their soldiers and don't respect them or the vets, but besides a i don't think this is the first game depicting talibans and USA or any other ally in a game. I remember Delta Force.
|
Comment by: bogwart16 (Sep 09, 2010 18:31) Quote: I am no a fan of the US but I see no reason why you should start slagging them off out of context.
|
Comment by: ddp (Sep 09, 2010 18:50) 2nd that.
|
Comment by: senator29 (Sep 09, 2010 21:29) Term and concept of "taliban" was created by the USA.
|
Comment by: bigredbus (Sep 09, 2010 21:53) Originally posted by davidike: I don't usually comment on AfterDawn posts; most of the time the posted comments are quite good and on the mark. However, you sir, are the exception. You appear to have an "extremely" uninformed mind. Your writing is pure emotional nonsense! I suggest that you temporarily stop posting for about one year and read; learn about American, European and Middle Eastern history
|
Comment by: FredBun (Sep 10, 2010 03:15) Originally posted by babelfish: |
Comment by: Jemborg (Sep 10, 2010 07:17) Originally posted by Dardandec: I whole heartedly agree... great post Elk.
Originally posted by Amak: So pro-war rhetoric is ok? Whether you agree with him/her or not he/she is entitled to his/her opinion ~ it's not off topic.
Its a lot easier being righteous than right.
![]() |
Comment by: FredBun (Sep 10, 2010 14:59) (not a SAS or Green Beret in sight). :)
|
Comment by: babelfish (Sep 10, 2010 15:05) he is right tho. games are so american-centric, especially ww2 games. you would have thought the USA was a major player in ww2 and not the side that came in in injury time ;)
:: If you were a woman i'd sock you - Peter Griffin ::
|
Comment by: Jemborg (Sep 10, 2010 21:59) Originally posted by FredBun: Don't be so sensitive Fred ~ I knew that. I was just joking. Chill out.
Its a lot easier being righteous than right.
![]() |
Comment by: davidike (Sep 10, 2010 22:27) it all comes down to mind control by th Americans as per usual, its ok to depict us murdering innocent people but as soon as its the enemy of our government (not the countries citizens) its not allowed.
|
Comment by: FredBun (Sep 11, 2010 04:05) I wouldn't joke about mis-statements like that, history is either fact or it's not history at all, if you say your Dad is what he is I'm sure his veins would swell reading some of this crap on this thread, he I'm sure would not be in any mood to be chilling out, there are so many miss-quotes on this thread it's unbelievable.
|
Comment by: Jemborg (Sep 11, 2010 06:07) I'm sure he would appreciate it if he was alive Fred.
Its a lot easier being righteous than right.
![]() |
Comment by: davidike (Sep 11, 2010 11:55) the blocking of soldiers playing this game is just mind control and propaganda from the USA government, remember its only terrorism when they do it, we have the white hats on!
|
Comment by: FredBun (Sep 11, 2010 13:43) You know what, I'm gonna do something here I never do, I try to be gentleman like, I always try to give anybody the benefit of dought, I never try to lose it, this time and I don't give a shit if I even get banned.
|
Comment by: ddp (Sep 11, 2010 17:14) fred, don't worry.
|
Comment by: Jemborg (Sep 11, 2010 18:46) Originally posted by ddp: They should BOTH be warned. I did not like in this instance having a ad hominum personal shot taken at me from someone who decides to play miss the bleeding point and attack over what was an obvious joke in the light of previous comments on the thread.
Its a lot easier being righteous than right.
![]() |
Comment by: chanulus (Sep 12, 2010 05:25) Originally posted by davidike: yes because wikileaks is such a nonpartial source of information...
|
