Latest news |
---|
Xbox 360 claims best attach rate for nowDela @ Nov 08, 2008 05:09 | 24 comments
Nevertheless, it is used in the industry as a measure of a console's performance in the market overall. More interesting than the overall tie rate is the difference specifically in the sales of first and third-party games. Nintendo, for example, is expected to have a higher tie rate for 1st party games compared to the Xbox 360 and PS3.
Overall, the PS3 console has an attach rate of 5.3, the Nintendo Wii has an attach rate of 5.5 and the Xbox 360's rate stands at 6.6. For third party titles, the Xbox 360's attach rate is 5.2, compared to the PS3's 4.4 and Wii's 3.1. As for first-party software, the Wii console has a tie rate of 2.4, compared to Xbox 360's 1.4 and PS3's 0.9.
The higher rate for first-party titles for the Wii is hardly surprising. Often cross-platform titles don't debut on the Wii console because of the hardware limitations, but both the Microsoft and Sony consoles are free to fight over sales of a lot of the same game titles. |
![]() |
Comment by: TBandit (Nov 08, 2008 07:05) I think because 360 also has alot of platinum games out, the cheap 20$ ones. |
Comment by: susieqbbb (Nov 08, 2008 15:44) Higher attach rate yes!!!
|
Comment by: windsong (Nov 08, 2008 19:21) I'll stick with PC games. Ba$tards STILL have not fixed the RROD. Might as well enjoy burning your money in the fireplace than to give it to the SUITS at Microsoft. |
Comment by: Dela (Nov 08, 2008 20:00) I have had the same XBox 360 since 2005, played at least 40 games on it for many hundreds and hundreds of hours since, and even hundreds more for XviD, AVC etc. I have never experienced anything resembling RROD. In addition, my brother has an Xbox 360 for a year or so and he uses it even more than I do (mostly on Live) and I have a lot of friends who bought 360 because it came down in price, I've yet to hear one complain about RROD. Everytime there is an Xbox 360 article thats all I see is "RROD RROD RROD RROD", I understand people literally hate Microsoft, and I am more than aware there are ppl who experienced RROD many times (one of our Admins actually is on his 3rd 360 since 2005) but the idea that every Xbox 360 owner is plagued by hardware bugs is simply false, if it was true, it would be much much bigger news.
|
Comment by: Dela (Nov 08, 2008 20:14) Quote: Well putting aside the fact that its a parent's job to control the content their kids are exposed to and not M$, there is a reason the console has parent control features built in.
Quote: With Wii you might have a point, since it's geared more as a family console (but has plenty of violent games of its own now). When I go to gamestop though, I see plenty of games suitable for kids sold on Xbox 360 and PS3.
Quote: Not true, drive hacks will only boot backups of games and playing backups on Live will get you banned. Drive hacks don't allow for homebrew or anything else that would make it easier to cheat.
Quote: Strangely enough gaming sales don't seem to be affected by economic downturns as would be expected. I guess it's because it's a better decision to get a game that will provide a lot more entertainment than going to see a movie or buying music CDs or DVDs. New games are quite expensive, but older titles (even just 1-2 years out) drop in price pretty quickly so I'd assume they'll sell well. |
Comment by: creaky (Nov 08, 2008 20:19) Hey there Dela, long time no see.
![]() gif created by phantom69, he's a good lad Forum Rules - http://forums.afterdawn.com/thread_view.cfm/2487 'Verbatim Taiyo Yuden', vanilla Verbatim, vanilla Taiyo Yuden & RICOHJPNR03 are the ONLY media allowed near my Burners/standalone players ![]() |
Comment by: locobrown (Nov 08, 2008 22:28) Most of us already own or would like a 360 but its already been 3 years since its launch date. For example, The Xbox 1 was launched on November 15, 2001 and 4 years later NVIDIA ceased production of the Xbox's GPU in August 2005. I bought my xbox in 2004 and 1 year it became obsolete. At this point in time, many of us can sense that maybe in a year or two the 360 may be replaced by another version. The RROD is the reason why microsoft hasn't been able to dominate the market. Why even consider purchasing a new console? I happened to once and I don't want it to happen to me again. I bought my 360 during its launch and have had various service repairs, if it continues to fail I'll keep on shipping it back for repair, but I wouldn't buy a new one. |
Comment by: Jemborg (Nov 08, 2008 23:06) Gidday Creaky, dunno if this helps "Quick Media Converter"
Its a lot easier being righteous than right.
|
Comment by: locobrown (Nov 09, 2008 02:38) That's true. A large amount of money has been invested, but they have also recorded huge amount of losses. I would really like to buy a new console but microsoft wasn't addressed a longevity prediction for the 360 that I'm aware of. The 360 was rushed because after NVIDIA stopped making the GPU then almost immediately in November of that same year the 360 was released. XBMC Xbox - Version 1.0 & 1.6: Softmod - Both SID 5.01, DVD Drive Upgrades - Samsung 616F & 616T, HDD - Samsung 500GB;
The Ultimate Xbox Modding Thread and Software in all of Afterdawn! by "chunkhead" - http://forums.afterdawn.com/thread_view.cfm/536595 PS2 V7 39001: Codebreaker 10 + USB Method, 64MB MC Exploit, Boot= uLaunchELF v4.12, Network Adapater Samsung 200GB (+[__]%) PSP Fat: history OFW 1.50>2.71> Pandora> CFW>3.71M33-2> 3.71M33-4 (+[__]%) PSP, 2 Slims: history OFW 3.80 & 4.05> Pandora> Both CFW>3.71M33-2> 4.01M33-2> 5.00M33>2>3 |
Comment by: Dela (Nov 09, 2008 08:27) Quote:
Quote: I don't think RROD is really affecting it _that_ much at all to be honest. You have to take in the facts. The console launched early in 2005, over a year ahead of the PS3 (15 months if in Europe), and so in 2006 there was one very noticeable thing; a fairly crappy supply of games, until late into the year when it was time to start fighting with Sony. There is no doubt that 2007 was a better year for games line-up for the Xbox 360 and a terrible year for Sony, and besides the price tag, the sales of the hardware definitely showed it.
Quote: It's only out three years, it has years left. Heck, they are launching the new dashboard and a shit load of new stuff for the console this month, they have absolutely no plans to cease production of the console. As for the losses... it's Microsoft, they can take it because they are in it for the long haul, its a multi-billion industry and there's a lot of license fees etc. that Sony, Nintendo and M$ stand to gain from the software sales. This is not Xbox 1, Microsoft is pushing to win this generation. Whatever way it will go, we have to wait and see, but there's absolutely no way the console has a 4 year life-span on the market, it would be an insane move. |
Comment by: Jemborg (Nov 09, 2008 08:52) Originally posted by locobrown: Hmmm, I would have thought nVidia would cheerfully have kept making the GPU chip if a huge customer like M$ kept wanting it- it makes commercial sense. Also consider the time it takes to design a new console and factor in that they had a special version of the IBM Xeon series developed for the CPU (NOT a typical PC chip), a new deal with ATI and another specialist GPU... I'd say the rushing was to get the drop on $ony in install base terms.
Its a lot easier being righteous than right.
|
Comment by: ZippyDSM (Nov 10, 2008 00:17) Add up the attach rate times the total unit sales the WII is the clear winner on software sold.
|
Comment by: Jemborg (Nov 10, 2008 01:04) ROFLMAO
|
Comment by: ZippyDSM (Nov 10, 2008 01:22) Originally posted by Jemborg: Fact dose that alot.....
|
Comment by: Jemborg (Nov 10, 2008 01:31) heh *wipes tear from eye*
Its a lot easier being righteous than right.
|
Comment by: ZippyDSM (Nov 10, 2008 01:41) Originally posted by Jemborg: So basically it looks like a larger PS3 but plays 360 games*hides*.
|
Comment by: Jemborg (Nov 10, 2008 02:14) WHAT???
|
Comment by: ZippyDSM (Nov 10, 2008 02:25) Originally posted by Jemborg: The control accept or the less "protection" aspect? :P
|
Comment by: L-Burna (Nov 10, 2008 03:09) Its possible to run XBMC off a dev unit,but it won't happen on most regular units without being able to gain access into the nand firmware.I've seen a couple systems with earlier kernels and firmware use XBMC,but they are launch consoles with extremely old kernels.Besides you would have to install the infectus modchip with the timing attack add-on,and have your drive flashed in order to run linux.I've been waiting for some type of method that could gain access into the nand firmware for any kernel version now that would be nice,because XBMC and whatever you want could happen.The sad thing is I already checked up on it,and would like to see something similar as well.For those that are interested in XBMC for the XBox 360 you must look into the nand firmware hacks.Anything is possible once you gain access to the nand firmware as it contains pretty much everything you want to know. ![]() ...........................:SiG cReAtEd By Phantom69:............................ |
Comment by: Jemborg (Nov 10, 2008 04:11) *I know we are all swerving a little off-topic moderators, but things are slow here and so I'm just chatting with a mate :D*
Its a lot easier being righteous than right.
|
Comment by: ZippyDSM (Nov 10, 2008 04:24) Jemborg
|
Comment by: Jemborg (Nov 10, 2008 08:59) Speak up Sonny Jim... you played what??
|
Comment by: L-Burna (Nov 13, 2008 23:25) Hey Jemborg I know I'm late on the reply,but the reason the exploit doesn't work anymore is because Microsoft patched all the kernels and did some hardware revisions.In this case the eFuses if you blow them on later revisions then your pretty much screwed,but I wouldn't say it can't be done just gotta look for alternative methods.The nand firmware can still be dumped on any system its the scheme they use in order to decrypt it which is the problem.If Linux can be installed a different way besides using the hacked firmware,and a fix for the blown eFuses arises a softmod might develop from it.That is a long shot though,because its pretty complicated as its dealing with hardware and encryption schemes.For all I know Microsoft could have implemented some off the wall encryption scheme over the years,but finding a solution for the hardware revisions is a problem. ![]() ...........................:SiG cReAtEd By Phantom69:............................ |
Comment by: Jemborg (Nov 14, 2008 09:04) Hey L-Burna. Yeah i kinda figured something like that from your previous posts here. I'm a little astounded that M$ would go to the extent of sabotaging your equipment, at least that's how it effectively turns out.
Its a lot easier being righteous than right.
|
